College Publications logo   College Publications title  
View Basket
Homepage Contact page
   
 
AiML
Academia Brasileira de Filosofia
Algorithmics
Arts
Cadernos de Lógica e Computação
Cadernos de Lógica e Filosofia
Cahiers de Logique et d'Epistemologie
Communication, Mind and Language
Computing
Comptes Rendus de l'Academie Internationale de Philosophie des Sciences
Cuadernos de lógica, Epistemología y Lenguaje
DEON
Dialogues
Economics
Encyclopaedia of Logic
Filosofia
Handbooks
Historia Logicae
IfColog series in Computational Logic
Journal of Applied Logics - IfCoLog Journal
Journals
Landscapes
Logics for New-Generation AI
Logic and Law
Logic and Semiotics
Logic PhDs
Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science
The Logica Yearbook
Marked States
Neural Computing and Artificial Intelligence
Philosophy
Research
The SILFS series
Studies in Logic
Studies in Talmudic Logic
Student Publications
Systems
Texts in Logic and Reasoning
Texts in Mathematics
Tributes
Other
Digital Downloads
Information for authors
About us
Search for Books
 



Logic and Law


Back

Is Legal Reasoning Irrational? An Introduction to the Epistemology of Law

Second Edition

John Woods

This is a much revised and expanded second edition of the first book to examine the logical and epistemological assumptions that animate the proceedings of criminal trials in common law jurisdictions. The objective of trials is to arrive at true and just verdicts and, in particular, to avoid false convictions.

The concepts of greatest operational significance in a criminal proceedings are the logico-epistemic ones of evidence, testimony, expert opinion, proof, truth, truthfulness, belief, knowledge, argument, inference, relevance, probability and their like. Since there are well-established philosophical theories of all other matters, it is only natural that we seek their guidance in assessing how well or badly the criminal law in everyday practice heeds their criteria. The starting point of this volume is that the practices of law comply with these standards very badly; badly enough to call into question the law’s capacity to fulfill its obligation to avoid false verdicts.

Written for readers who care about truth and justice in the law yet may lack a technical acquaintance with logic and epistemology, this book crafts a case for the inadequacy of those technical standards for criminal law. It is a book that puts those standards on trial.

John Woods, is Director of the Abductive Systems Group in the Department of Philosophy in the University of British Columbia. He is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada.


September 2015/August 2018

978-1-84890-162-9

Buy from Amazon: UK   US   






© 2005–2024 College Publications / VFH webmaster