College Publications logo   College Publications title  
View Basket
Homepage Contact page
   
 
AiML
Academia Brasileira de Filosofia
Algorithmics
Arts
Cadernos de Lógica e Computação
Cadernos de Lógica e Filosofia
Cahiers de Logique et d'Epistemologie
Communication, Mind and Language
Computing
Comptes Rendus de l'Academie Internationale de Philosophie des Sciences
Cuadernos de lógica, Epistemología y Lenguaje
DEON
Dialogues
Economics
Encyclopaedia of Logic
Filosofia
Handbooks
Historia Logicae
IfColog series in Computational Logic
IfColog Lecture series
IfColog Proceedings
Journal of Applied Logics - IfCoLog Journal
About
Editorial Board
Scope of the Journal
Submissions
Forthcoming papers
Journals
Landscapes
Logics for New-Generation AI
Logic and Law
Logic and Semiotics
Logic PhDs
Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science
The Logica Yearbook
Neural Computing and Artificial Intelligence
Philosophy
Research
The SILFS series
Studies in Logic
Studies in Talmudic Logic
Student Publications
Systems
Texts in Logic and Reasoning
Texts in Mathematics
Tributes
Other
Digital Downloads
Information for authors
About us
Search for Books
 



Forthcoming papers


Back

An even more Leibnizian version of Gödel’s ontological argument

To be published in Special Issue on Formal Approaches to the Ontological Argument

Kordula Świętorzecka and Marcin Łyczak

We propose a modification of Gödel’s ontological argument for God’s existence
from his ‘Ontologischer Beweis’ manuscript (1970).We follow a Leibnizian
onto-theology, especially two of Leibniz’s letters from 1676 and 1677, to which
Gödel could relate. We consider two differences between Gödel and Leibniz. We
argue for the superiority of Leibniz’s ideas, while preserving the main structure
of the Gödelian argument. Our first aim is to bring Gödel’s concept of
positiveness closer to the idea of a Leibnizian perfectio which should not be
understood via negations. Our second goal is to analyze the concept of being
necessary in terms of a Leibnizian demonstrability. To this end, we formulate
an S4 version of Gödel’s argument without using negative predicate terms. We
sketch a model for our theory that allows us to express a few specific properties
of the Leibnizian God.
Keywords: ontological argument,

30 July 2018






© 2005–2024 College Publications / VFH webmaster